EPA proposes alternative, low-cost NOx monitoring
Log in to view your state's edition
You are not logged in
State:
Free Special Reports
Get Your FREE Special Report. Download Any One Of These FREE Special Reports, Instantly!
Featured Special Report
Claim Your Free Copy of 2018 EHS Salary Guide

This report will help you evaluate if you are being paid a fair amount for the responsibilities you are shouldering.

In addition, EHS managers can find the information to keep their departments competitive and efficient—an easy way to guarantee you are paying the right amount to retain hard-to-fill positions but not overpaying on others.

Download Now!
Bookmark and Share
September 28, 2018
EPA proposes alternative, low-cost NOx monitoring

Under a new EPA proposal, approximately 310 sources subject to monitoring under the Agency’s NOx SIP Call regulations would be able to use options to the emissions monitoring requirements now required by the regulations. According to the proposal (September 27, 2018, Federal Register (FR)), states are meeting their NOx SIP Call statewide emissions budgets assigned to the sources by substantial margins. Accordingly, the EPA says it believes that other lower-cost forms of monitoring for these sources can provide sufficient assurance that the NOx SIP Call’s required emissions reductions will continue to be achieved.

As an EHS professional, it’s hard to tell if you are being paid competitively, and as an employer, it’s hard to tell if you are offering salaries that are competitive and efficient. For a Limited Time we’re offering a FREE copy of the 2018 EHS Salary Guide! Download Now

Non-EGU boilers

Promulgated by the EPA in 1998, the NOx SIP Call requires 20 states and the District of Columbia to revise their Clean Air Act (CAA) state implementation plans (SIPs) to reduce seasonal nitrogen oxides (NOx) emissions contributing to interstate ozone pollution. Since implementation of emissions controls under the NOx SIP Call began in 2003, the regulations have required these jurisdictions to include provisions in their SIPs under which certain large electricity generating units (EGUs) and large non-EGU boilers and turbines must monitor their seasonal NOx emissions according to the procedures in 40 CFR Part 75.

Almost all the affected large EGUs currently participate in the Acid Rain Program or Cross-State Air Pollution Rule (CSAPR) trading programs, which have comparable monitoring requirements, but few of the affected large non-EGUs participate in these other programs. Over time, many of the originally affected large non-EGUs have retired or switched to cleaner fuels, and newly affected large non-EGUs generally have lower emissions rates, so total NOx emissions from the group are considerably lower than in the past. Given these developments, several states expressed interest in establishing alternative, potentially lower-cost monitoring requirements for the remaining large non-EGUs.

The proposal would not affect most large EGUs. These units would still be required to use 40 CFR Part 75 NOx monitoring, which is mandatory under the emissions trading programs of the CAA’s Acid Rain Program and CSAPR. The EPA emphasizes that the proposed changes would have no effect on the emissions budgets that states are subject to under the NOx SIP Call.

CEMS can be discontinued

The proposal does not go into extensive detail about which kinds of alternative monitoring the sources would adopt in place of the 40 CFR Part 75 provisions. However, the EPA notes that about 230 units currently using continuous emissions monitoring systems (CEMS) may ultimately be able to discontinue use of stack gas flow rate CEMS, gas concentration CEMS, or both, to the extent that the units do not face similar monitoring requirements under other state or federal regulations.

“Discontinuing usage of one or both types of CEMS has the potential to result in reductions in overall monitoring costs,” states the EPA. “Further, even if a unit remains subject to requirements to use some type of CEMS under other regulations, the specific CEMS-related requirements under the other regulations may entail lower costs than the specific CEMS-related requirements under Part 75.”

The proposal includes several additional amendments unrelated to monitoring, including clarifying existing regulatory text that mischaracterizes the incremental emissions reductions required in states’ Phase II SIP submissions and removing several obsolete provisions regarding the relationship between the NOx SIP Call and other regulations, including the 1997 ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards.

Featured Special Report:
2018 EHS Salary Guide
   
   
 
 
Twitter   Facebook   Linked In
Follow Us