Interest in dry cooling is growing at power plants
Log in to view your state's edition
You are not logged in
State:
Free Special Reports
Get Your FREE Special Report. Download Any One Of These FREE Special Reports, Instantly!
Featured Special Report
Claim Your Free Copy of 2018 EHS Salary Guide

This report will help you evaluate if you are being paid a fair amount for the responsibilities you are shouldering.

In addition, EHS managers can find the information to keep their departments competitive and efficient—an easy way to guarantee you are paying the right amount to retain hard-to-fill positions but not overpaying on others.

Download Now!
Bookmark and Share
August 31, 2018
Interest in dry cooling is growing at power plants

The use of ambient air to cool and condense steam at electric power plants is a costly alternative to water cooling, but the use of air, or dry cooling, is being gradually adopted by energy companies, reports the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA). Dry cooling or hybrid cooling—a combination of air and water—occurs in 3 percent of all U.S. thermoelectric generating capacity, says the EIA, most of which has come online since 2000. But there may be an upswing in the use of air and hybrid cooling as utilities continue to move away from coal-fired generation to natural gas generation.

As an EHS professional, it’s hard to tell if you are being paid competitively, and as an employer, it’s hard to tell if you are offering salaries that are competitive and efficient. For a Limited Time we’re offering a FREE copy of the 2018 EHS Salary Guide! Download Now

“Dry cooling systems tend to be more economical for natural gas combined-cycle (NGCC) plants because the amount of cooling needed is much less per megawatt hour than for coal or nuclear plants,” says the EIA. “More than 15 percent of operating generating capacity from NGCC plants in the United States use dry cooling technology. In the past five years (2013–2017), almost 4.3 gigawatts (GW) of NGCC capacity using a dry cooling system came online.”

EPA’s Cooling Water Intake rule

While dry cooling is not the low-cost option, it allows companies to avoid complying with the EPA’s Cooling Water Intake (CWI) rule for existing generating plants and factories (August 15, 2014, Federal Register (FR)). That rule requires that facilities that draw in more than 2 million gallons a day for cooling obtain National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permits that include requirements to reduce the impingement and entrainment of aquatic organisms. Once-through water also returns to water bodies at a higher temperature, another burden to aquatic organisms.

Closed-cycle recirculation of cooling water is less environmentally problematic than once-through water, but the CWI rule did not require recirculating for existing facilities. However, new facilities must reduce actual water intake to a level commensurate with what is achieved by closed-cycle recirculation.

When the rule was promulgated, the EPA noted that of the 1,065 existing facilities subject to the rule (521 manufacturers and 544 power plants), about 40 percent were already implementing the technologies required by the action. Today, the EIA says that more than 61 percent of the thermoelectric generating capacity in the United States recirculates cooling water. Plants that use once-through cooling systems account for 36 percent of U.S. thermoelectric generating capacity, adds the EIA.

In July 2018, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit upheld the CWI rule against all challenges from industry and environmental groups. The court also upheld the biological opinion on the effects of the CWI rule, which was issued by the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service and the National Marine Fisheries Service.

Cool temperatures, dry regions

The effectiveness or desirability of dry cooling is tied to certain environmental factors. For example, plants with hybrid operations tend to rely on dry cooling systems during the cooler months and wet cooling systems during the hotter seasons when dry systems have lower efficiency. The EIA also found that new solar energy plants in the Southwest are utilizing dry cooling because water resources are relatively scarce.

Less cooling at gas plants

Currently, 83 power plants are operating dry and hybrid cooling systems in the United States, says the EIA. These plants support about 20 GW of steam-generating capacity. California has the highest number of plants with dry cooling systems (13), but Texas has the most dry cooling capacity (2.8 GW), closely followed by Virginia (2.4 GW).

As noted, dry and hybrid cooling capacity is most commonly found in NGCC facilities, which account for more than 83 percent of the operating dry and hybrid cooling capacity. According to the EIA, dry cooling systems tend to be more economical for NGCC plants because the amount of cooling needed is much less per megawatt hour than for coal or nuclear plants. Overall, more than 15 percent of operating generating capacity from NGCC plants in the United States use dry cooling technology. In the past 5 years (2013–2017), almost 4.3 GW of NGCC capacity using a dry cooling system came online.

The EIA’s summary of the prevalence of dry and hybrid cooling at power plants is here.   

Featured Special Report:
2018 EHS Salary Guide
   
   
 
 
Twitter   Facebook   Linked In
Follow Us