EPA proposes drinking water limit for perchlorate
Log in to view your state's edition
You are not logged in
State:
Free Special Reports
Get Your FREE Special Report. Download Any One Of These FREE Special Reports, Instantly!
Featured Special Report
Claim Your Free Copy of 2018 EHS Salary Guide

This report will help you evaluate if you are being paid a fair amount for the responsibilities you are shouldering.

In addition, EHS managers can find the information to keep their departments competitive and efficient—an easy way to guarantee you are paying the right amount to retain hard-to-fill positions but not overpaying on others.

Download Now!
Bookmark and Share
May 30, 2019
EPA proposes drinking water limit for perchlorate

Stating that the benefits of a National Primary Drinking Water Regulation (NPDWR) for perchlorate do not justify the costs of such a regulation, the EPA is nonetheless proposing an NPDWR for the chemical. Under the proposal, the Agency would set the NPDWR at a Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) of 56 micrograms per liter (µg/L). The associated Maximum Contaminant Level Goal (MCLG) would also be set at 56 µg/L. Public comments are also requested on two alternative regulations—an MCL and MCLG set at 18 µg/L and also at 90 µg/L.

As an EHS professional, it’s hard to tell if you are being paid competitively, and as an employer, it’s hard to tell if you are offering salaries that are competitive and efficient. For a Limited Time we’re offering a FREE copy of the 2018 EHS Salary Guide! Download Now

The proposal would fulfill a determination the EPA made in 2011 under the Obama administration that perchlorate should be regulated under the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA). However, the Agency is also requesting comment on whether it should withdraw the 2011 determination and thereby decline, at least for the near future, to establish an MCL and MCLG for perchlorate.

Sources and health effects

Perchlorate is a naturally occurring and manufactured chemical commonly used as an oxidizer in rocket propellants, munitions, fireworks, airbag initiators for vehicles, matches, and signal flares. Of the domestically produced (high-grade) perchlorate, 90 percent is manufactured for use in the defense and aerospace industries, primarily in the form of ammonium perchlorate. Types of military and defense-related facilities with known releases include missile ranges and missile and rocket manufacturing facilities. However, the EPA has noted that since site-specific documentation may not be available and based on historical uncertainties, it is generally difficult to identify specific military sites with known perchlorate releases. Perchlorate occurs naturally in some fertilizers.

The thyroid gland is the primary target of perchlorate toxicity in humans. Thyroid hormones play an important role in regulating metabolism and are critical for normal growth and development in fetuses, infants, and young children. Perchlorate can interfere with iodide uptake into the thyroid gland at high enough exposures, disrupting the functions of the thyroid and potentially leading to a reduction in the production of thyroid hormones.

Health advisory and determination

In January 2008, the EPA published an interim health advisory for perchlorate of 15 µg/L. At that time, the Agency stated that exposure to this level for more than 30 days but less than a year is not expected to cause adverse noncancer effects. Health advisories serve as informal guidance to assist managers of water systems; they are not legally enforceable standards. Also, two states have established their own drinking water limits for perchlorate. In 2006, Massachusetts promulgated a drinking water standard for perchlorate of 2 µg/L. California followed in 2007 with a drinking water standard of 6 µg/L.

In its 2011 determination, the EPA found that perchlorate met the SDWA’s three criteria for regulating a contaminant:

  • The contaminant may have an adverse effect on the health of persons.
  • The contaminant is known to occur or there is a substantial likelihood that the contaminant will occur in public water systems (PWSs) with a frequency and at levels of public health concern.
  • In the sole judgment of the administrator, regulation of such contaminant presents a meaningful opportunity for health risk reduction for persons served by PWSs.

In its proposal, the EPA notes that data collected through its Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule (UCMR) suggest that under an MCL of 56 µg/L, two PWSs (0.004 percent of all PWSs in the United States) would exceed the regulatory threshold. One of these two PWSs would exceed the alternative MCL of 90 µg/L. At an MCL of 18 µg/L, there would be 15 PWSs (0.03 percent of all PWSs in the United States) that would exceed the regulatory threshold.

Perchlorate can be removed from drinking water with several “advanced” technologies, says the EPA, including regenerable and single-pass ion exchange, reverse osmosis, and fixed- and fluidized-bed biological treatment.

Monitoring requirement

The proposed rule would affect 58,325 PWSs serving 10,000 or fewer people. To meet the proposed requirements, all of these small systems would need to conduct perchlorate monitoring. According to the Agency, at the proposed MCL of 56 µg/L, the UCMR monitoring data indicate that no small PWSs would be required to incur costs to reduce the levels of perchlorate in drinking water; therefore, under the proposal, all small PWSs will incur monitoring costs only. In addition, the EPA estimates that no small PWSs will experience an impact of 1 percent or greater of average annual revenues under the monitoring requirement.

Featured Special Report:
2018 EHS Salary Guide
   
   
 
 
Twitter   Facebook   Linked In
Follow Us