Industry responds to proposed steam electric ELGs
Log in to view your state's edition
You are not logged in
Free Special Reports
Get Your FREE Special Report. Download Any One Of These FREE Special Reports, Instantly!
Featured Special Report
Claim Your Free Copy of 2018 EHS Salary Guide

This report will help you evaluate if you are being paid a fair amount for the responsibilities you are shouldering.

In addition, EHS managers can find the information to keep their departments competitive and efficient—an easy way to guarantee you are paying the right amount to retain hard-to-fill positions but not overpaying on others.

Download Now!
Bookmark and Share
October 09, 2013
Industry responds to proposed steam electric ELGs
By Amanda Czepiel, JD, Senior Managing Editor

In her presentation, “Impacts of Proposed Revised Steam Electric Effluent Guidelines” at this year’s Water Environment Federation Technical Exhibition and Conference (WEFTEC) in Chicago, Donna Hill, the Water Program Director at Water Southern Company Services, Inc. didn’t mince words about how industry views EPA’s job of developing the guidelines.

As an EHS professional, it’s hard to tell if you are being paid competitively, and as an employer, it’s hard to tell if you are offering salaries that are competitive and efficient. For a Limited Time we’re offering a FREE copy of the 2018 EHS Salary Guide! Download Now

According to Hill, they based the proposed guidelines on “very limited data and didn’t represent the industry as a whole.”

The proposed guidelines would affect 1,200 facilities nationwide, and would establish new or additional requirements for wastewater streams from the following processes and by-products associated with steam electric power generation:

  • Flue gas desulfurization
  • Fly ash
  • Bottom ash
  • Flue gas mercury control, and
  • Gasification of such fuels as coal and petroleum coke

Hill has prepared many comments on the guidelines, and her concerns, which were echoed by industry attendees in the session, are that EPA’s statistical analysis is flawed because the agency selected unrepresentative data, only using sampling from two facilities, and that even if a facility installs the recommended technology to achieve the new limits, there is no guarantee that those limits will be met.

Comments on the proposed guidelines were due on September 20, 2013, and the guidelines are scheduled to be finalized on May 22, 2014. However, Hill believes that the EPA will not meet this deadline even though it is required under a court order, and that we should expect the final regulations at the end of 2014 or at the beginning of 2015.

Featured Special Report:
2018 EHS Salary Guide
Twitter   Facebook   Linked In
Follow Us