In this issue:

• EPA adds bromopropane to hazardous air pollutant list
• EPA finalizes amendments for organic liquids distribution facilities
• EPA finalizes controversial CWA Section 401 certification rule
• EPA fines fertilizer plants, says many regulated facilities fail to adequately monitor risks
• EPA seeks consistent and transparent cost-benefit analysis
• Compliance tip: Spill Prevention (SPCC Plan)
• EPA faces backlash and lawsuits over MATS changes
• Using industrial cleaning agents safely
• EPA final rule modernizes ignitable liquids determinations
• Enforcement

In this issue:

• Senate Committee approves two big water bills
• Climate effects polarize NEPA commenters
• EPA proposes streamlined gasoline regulations
• EPA amends leak threshold for site remediation facilities
• EPA reverses power plant mercury finding
• Compliance Tip: Community Right to Know
• U.S. Court of Appeals rules that EPA must set new limits for omitted HAPs
• Contingency plan emergency coordinators
• Vehicle defeat devices and tampering
• Enforcement

In this issue:

• Inspector’s 12-year report shows downward trend in enforcement
• Draft asbestos evaluation lists unreasonable risks
• Administration protects consumer choice in vehicle rule
• Small coal plants get help from MATS amendment
• Compliance Tip: Spill prevention (SPCC Plan)
• Supreme Court rules permits needed for groundwater discharges
• Hazard communication (HazCom): The SDS and exposure control
• Subsurface connections under the Navigable Waters Rule
• EPA amends TSCA CDR requirements
• Enforcement

In this issue:

• EPA revises BE method
• CSB accident reporting rule: What you need to know
• New EPA rule states civil inspection procedures
• EPA supplements science transparency proposal
• EPA relaxes requirements for HFC refrigerants
• Compliance Tip: Hazardous waste storage
• EPA’s committee policy falls short of rational decision-making
• SPCC: Understanding the SPCC Plan
• Waste solvents: To test or not to test
• Enforcement

In this issue:

• Financial assurance not required for chemical companies, says EPA
• EIA forecasts U.S. and global energy cases; CO2 increases foreseen over long term
• AGs comment on EtO NESHAP
• House leader questions legality and motivation of memo to the SAB
• A new look to Title V petitions
• Compliance tip: SPCC Plan requirements
• EPA’s discretion deciding factor in dredge-and-fill case
• Managing universal waste mercury-containing equipment
• Expedited settlements for SPCC violations
• Enforcement